Thoughts on “Capitalism” episode of Open Source podcast

While catching up on podcast listening during the Christmas holidays, I listened to the Radio Open Source episode “A Thousand Years of Capitalism“, hosted by Christopher Lydon with guest Sven Beckert, history professor at Harvard University. The episode was a discussion of Beckert’s latest work, “Capitalism: A Global History”. I thought the discussion was excellent, and I found it interesting that he pegs the “start” of capitalism as an economic system to merchant businesses in Aden around 1000 AD (a city in now-named Yemen). These businesses financed trade expeditions to bring goods back, sell them, and re-invest the profits into more expeditions. Later, this practice expanded to Europe, then other countries, but this was the start.

The next interesting item to me was how the Industrial Revolution was the start of investing capital in means of production (factories, equipment, etc.), moving away from the financier-led capitalism, and how it was difficult to convince people to work in factories. They were used to working for themselves or in small groups (peasants/serfs) for a local leader. Another “step-up” in the growth of capitalism was the use of slavery, and how Europeans invested in plantations in the US, which used large amounts of slave labor. I was not aware that plantations arose from foreign investment. Also, Beckert mentioned that the island of Barbados in the Caribbean Sea was populated by slaves and ran large sugar plantations.

The final part of the episode discussed the impact that capitalism has had on the world economy, and the possibility of developing other economic systems. Overall, this was a very good episode, well worth listening to again.

Thoughts on the “Winer WordPress Tease”

Dave Winer has been promoting his editor for WordPress sites, called WordLand, leading up to his keynote speech at WordCamp Canada in October 2025, as well as hinting about other WordPress-related projects. Recently, he asked readers to “Think Different About WordPress“, where he talks about how WordPress supports editing features that Mastodon and Bluesky do not support (linking, no character limits, and other features). WordPress also has “excellent support” for RSS and rssCloud, and has a “deep and powerful API“.

Dave Winer goes on to say that he is providing three things to bootstrap a development community around WordPress: (1) Apps (I assume this refers to WordLand), (2) a storage service (I assume this refers to his wpIdentity NPM package, which he uses for identity for his FeedLand feed reader, and also to provide storage for user writing (although it appears to use the MySQL database associated with a WordPress install)), and (3) content (to me, this is RSS from other sites, implying some feed reader app or link to a feed reader app (like FeedLand)).

Now, how does a development community arise from this? Well, I guess that if people want to use an API to interact with WordPress (create posts, manipulate data in the WordPress database), they can do that, and maybe wpIdentity makes it easier to create Node.js apps that can interact with WordPress (like WordLand). As Dave Winer has mentioned before, though, the WordPress API has been around for a long time, but does not seem to have gotten much use. I am not sure if providing an easier “front end” to an API will increase use of that API. The WordLand app up to this point has been “the example app”, but has been provided as a service (no source code), so it is more of a “working example” for developers, not an app that some one can build on. Finally, Dave Winer has been hinting about an “RSS timeline viewer“, which is perhaps where FeedLand comes in. Again, without the full picture, it is hard to see how these three things are going to spark a growth in WordPress application development.

Finally, Dave Winer posted a podcast on “the last chance for the open web“, in which he talks about WordLand as “really easy way to write for the open web that does not otherwise exist today”, among other topics. I do not see this as the “last chance” for anything. I have written before on the economics of software development and on innovation in RSS and podcasting. The open web is still there, still providing a platform for innovative work. Nobody stopped me from creating MyStatusTool as a Twitter replacement based on rssCloud, and nobody stopped me from collecting rssCloud-based tools at The Feed Network. I know that Dave Winer would like his writing tools to be able to push their content to all social media platforms. Maybe that is the “promised land” that WordPress might provide via the ActivityPub plugin and an AT Protocol plugin (not yet developed). We will have to wait and see…

Can worker’s cooperatives be successful?

Hamilton Nolan/How Things Work: Interview with Erik Forman, labor activist, and creator of The Drivers Cooperative (via Tracy Durnell). Three points I found interesting were Erik’s comments about (1) businesses could be capitalized (started) for $200K-$300K in loans, (2) “… could we just start companies that are owned by workers from the start, and are therefore run by workers in their own interests, and return wealth to the community instead of extracting it?”, and (3) “The main barrier is access to capital. We can build businesses that generate profit, but because the business is worker-owned, it doesn’t fit in the normative forms that venture capital prefers, and there really isn’t a large supply of risk capital for initiatives that serve a social purpose. It’s kind of the entire problem of capitalism, right? Workers don’t have capital. Definitionally. Otherwise we would not be workers.”. I enjoyed the article, and thought about myself as a career worker. I think that most people want a job, not a business, that starting and running a business is too much work, they would rather be paid for their labor and not deal with the other aspects of business ownership. For people working in the tech industry (computers, aviation, whatever tech you want to look at), it seems to me that there may be opportunities at the low end (small businesses), but few examples of cooperative business with a large number of employees. Certainly something to think about….

Charles Hugh Smith: Our Tax System is an Unfair Mess: Here’s How to Fix It – Make the U.S. attractive to labor and capital with low rates and a simple, fair tax system and the populace and economy will benefit.

Without basic income, people will die. With basic income, people will thrive.

Can Packt Publishing be making any money?

Recently, I was looking for some books on developing desktop applications for Ubuntu. It seemed that Packt Publishing had the most recent titles, which was one of the criteria I was using for selecting the books. However, I noticed that many of them were available as E-books for $5, compared to a hard copy price of $50 or more. After my searching, I then saw numerous Packt ads highlighting the $5 price. How can they (or their authors) be making any money at that price? To me, this removes incentive to spend the effort to create a book of 300 pages or more to sell for $5 a copy. Am I missing something here?

 

Paying for the development of software

I recently read a post on funding of software developed for academic/research use, the author stated that many grants are for new applications, and that funding agencies should consider supporting existing open source software that goes unfunded. There were links to papers such as the development of AstroPy, and a report by Nadia Eghbal on funding of Internet digital infrastructure development.  I have touched on this topic before in a recent post about the development/funding story of the Node Package Manager. All of these stories touch on some common problems:

  • People write software, put it out on the web, people use it or they don’t.
  • If a lot of people start using it, and start asking for features/fixes, how do those get done? How do the developers get reimbursed for their time and effort?
  • What if a business uses open source software at no direct cost? How can they depend on that software being supported and available?

Businesses that develop physical products that contain custom software pay for that software as part of the development cost of the product. This may be the best example of funding for software development.

To me, the idea of a subscription fee makes the most sense. The user paying a fee gets a specified level of support, for example, or early access to new versions. The developer gets a steadier stream of income than one-time payments (like for smartphone apps). There are other problems to address that I am not going to solve in this post, but people who develop applications should consider these topics before starting (they should “count the costs”).